structural functionalism theory vs conflict theory

There exist some difference about how this two theories, functionalist and conflict perspective sees gender and what is the importance in society. The only reason why gender roles still exist is because to maintain their power and status the dominant group is still working for that. First, the critique asserts that it is difficult to determine the functional importance of any job, as a system of interdependence makes every position necessary to the functioning of society. In this theory gender is viewed as an attempt from male to keep power and privilege over female, and males are seen as the dominant group while females are seen as the subordinate group. The conflict-theory approach offers a critique of structural-functionalism. In functionalist perspective gender roles contribute to social relations.Ĭonflict theory has a different look of gender. This theory has been criticized for reifying gender roles. The perspective of the second idea overlooks societal equilibrium.

This is the main difference between both concepts.

These division of labor are very efficient because create a maximum use of resources. Structural functionalism and conflict theory have opposing views on the dynamics of society since the first concept believes that society is inclined towards stability, and the second reason is that there is constant conflict. Also, it is viewed as a social system where particulars segments are responsible for specific labor acts. 4) Conflict theory seems to suffer from many of the same conceptual and logical problems (vague concepts, tautologies). This book chapter sets forth an approach for using. Gender differences are viewed from functionalism as an efficient way to create divisions and specializing of cooperative labour into specifically circumscribed tasks and roles. Although structural functionalism finds its roots much earlier than systems theory, as researchers use it today, it is based on systems theory. Knowing this, How different structural functionalism views gender than conflict theory does in a society? One of them is that structural functionalism sees society as a complex system, that permit it to interact cohesively, and looks society as a macro-level orientation while the conflict theory focuses on the social system that only work for a select few of society and is known because the struggle for dominance among social groups that compete for scarce resources. Just as structural functionalism was criticized for focusing too much on the stability of societies, conflict theory has been criticized because it tends to focus on conflict to the exclusion of recognizing stability. Structural functionalism and conflict theory have some different points of view.

Structural functionalism theory vs conflict theory